If you think AI startups will escape the fate of MedTech, think again.
Governments are rapidly moving to regulate AI, and if history is any indication, the result won’t be ethical oversight—it will be regulatory capture that cements control in the hands of a few insiders.
🔴 Just like MedTech, AI will soon require massive compliance spending to stay operational.
🔴 Just like MedTech, AI companies that can’t meet these standards will be blocked from the market.
🔴 Just like MedTech, “safety” will be used as the excuse to consolidate power.
Already, we are seeing signs that AI governance will become the next compliance minefield.
Requires AI models to pass strict risk assessments
Bans certain types of AI applications outright
Heavily favors Big Tech & government-approved vendors
Pushes for federal AI oversight & certification programs
Expected to become mandatory for AI companies seeking federal contracts
China: Government-mandated AI security reviews
U.K.: AI safety measures that prioritize corporate incumbents
U.S.: Federal agencies preparing binding compliance requirements for AI startups
This is the playbook that killed MedTech. Now, it's coming for AI.
As AI regulations tighten, nations face a choice:
1️⃣ Adopt the MedTech Model (Massive compliance costs, limited innovation, corporate monopolization)
2️⃣ Develop Sovereign AI Strategies (AI-driven governance without regulatory chokeholds)
🔴 UAE AI Strategy 2031 is already positioning itself as a leader in AI without overregulation.
🔴 Saudi Vision 2030 is investing in AI-driven governance to boost efficiency.
Nations that act now will dominate AI. Those that regulate first will fall behind.
🚀 Governments & AI leaders must act now to build AI sovereignty before compliance locks them out.
📩 Contact Ian Sharp, PhD
🌐 SharpMethod.org
📅 Schedule a Consultation
"If you regulate AI like MedTech, you kill innovation before it starts."